Acceptance of nuclear energy by pre-service teachers in Greece

Antonia Rafailia Vavoulioti; Georgios Stylos; Konstantinos T. Kotsis

doi:10.30935/aquademia/13205

Full Text (PDF)

Antonia Rafailia Vavoulioti ¹ , Georgios Stylos ¹ ^* , Konstantinos T. Kotsis ¹

More Detail

¹ University of Ioannina, Ioannina, GREECE^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

Nuclear energy is required to provide a reliable, sustainable, and environmentally friendly energy source. Its use, however, receives limited public support, mainly because of the nuclear disasters that have occurred in the past. People perceive it as more dangerous than it really is and does not consider its multiple benefits. In addition to their concerns about the consequences of a nuclear explosion, there are many other factors that affect their acceptance or non-acceptance of nuclear energy. In this research, pre-service teachers’ perceptions of Department of Primary Education at University of Ioannina regarding factors such as the proximity of nuclear power plants, social trust, safety perception, perceived benefits, environmental awareness, and perceived nuclear knowledge are being examined. The sample consisted of 500 persons, and a questionnaire was distributed for data collection, which included demographic questions and 29 questions related to acceptance of nuclear energy. Understanding the public perceptions and identifying the determinants of their acceptance is vital to establishing nuclear energy.

Keywords

public acceptance
pre-service teachers
nuclear energy
Greece

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

AQUADEMIA, 2023, Volume 7, Issue 1, Article No: ep23004

https://doi.org/10.30935/aquademia/13205

Publication date: 14 Apr 2023

Article Views: 707

Article Downloads: 384

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Apergis, N., Payne, J. E., Menyah, K., & Wolde-Rufael, Y. (2010). On the causal dynamics between emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and economic growth. Ecological Economics, 69(11), 2255-2260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.014
Baek, J. (2016). Do nuclear and renewable energy improve the environment? Empirical evidence from the United States. Ecological Indicators, 66, 352-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.01.059
Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186-3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
Bird, D., Haynes, K., Honert, R., McAneney, J., & Poortinga, W. (2014). Nuclear power in Australia: A comparative analysis of public opinion regarding climate change and the Fukushima disaster. Energy Policy, 65, 644-653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.047
Dittmar, M. (2012). Nuclear energy: Status and future limitations. Energy Policy, 37(1), 35-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.05.040
Duffey, R. B. (2005). Sustainable futures using nuclear energy. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 47(1-4), 535-543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnueene.2005.05.054
Findlay, T. (2011). Nuclear energy and global governance. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203834503
Forsberg, C. W. (2008). Sustainability by combining nuclear, fossil, and renewable energy sources. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 51(1), 192-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2008.04.002
Goh, T., & Ang, B. W. (2018). Quantifying CO₂ emission reductions from renewables and nuclear energy–Some paradoxes. Energy Policy, 113, 651-662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.11.019
Halkos, G., & Gkampoura, E. C. (2020). Reviewing usage, potentials, and limitations of renewable energy sources. Energies, 13(11), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13112906
Hambleton, R. K. (2001). The next generation of the ITC test translation and adaptation guidelines. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17(3), 164-172. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.17.3.164
Hao, Y., Guo, Y., Tian, B., & Shao, Y. (2019). What affects college students’ acceptance of nuclear energy? Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 222, 746-759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.040
Jennings, P. (2009). New directions in renewable energy education. Renewable Energy, 34(2), 435-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2008.05.005
Karakosta, C., Pappas, C., Marinakis, V., & Psarras, J. (2013). Renewable energy and nuclear power towards sustainable development: Characteristics and prospects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 22, 187-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.01.035
Kardooni, R., Yusoff, S. B., & Kari, F. B. (2016). Renewable energy technology acceptance in Peninsular Malaysia. Energy Policy, 88, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.10.005
Kessler, G. (2002). Requirements for nuclear energy in the 21^st century-nuclear energy as a sustainable energy source. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 40(3-4), 309-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-1970(02)00024-0
Kim, Y., Kim, M., & Kim, W. (2013). Effect of the Fukushima nuclear disaster on global public acceptance of nuclear energy. Energy Policy, 61, 822-828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.107
Kim, Y., Kim, W., & Kim, M. (2014). An international comparative analysis of public acceptance of nuclear energy. Energy Policy, 66, 475-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.039
Latré, E., Perko, T., & Thijssenb, P. (2017). Public opinion change after the Fukushima nuclear accident: The role of national context revisited. Energy Policy, 104, 124-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.027
McComas, K. A., Lu, H., Keranen, K. M., Furtney, M. A., & Song, H. (2016). Public perceptions and acceptance of induced earthquakes related to energy development. Energy Policy, 99, 27-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.026
Menyah, K., & Wolde-Rufael, Y. (2010). CO₂ emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy and economic growth in the US. Energy Policy, 38(6), 2911-2915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.01.024
Park, E., & Ohm, J. Y. (2014). Factors influencing the public intention to use renewable energy technologies in South Korea: Effects of the Fukushima nuclear accident. Energy Policy, 65, 198-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.037
Prati, G., & Zani, B. (2012). The effect of the Fukushima nuclear accident on risk perception, antinuclear behavioral intentions, attitude, trust, environmental beliefs, and values. Environment and Behavior, 45, 782-798. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512444286
Roh, S., & Kim, D. (2017). Effect of Fukushima accident on public acceptance of nuclear energy (Fukushima accident and nuclear public acceptance). Energy Sources, 12(6), 565-569. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2016.1230797
Siegrist, M., Sutterlin, B., & Keller, C. (2014). Why have some people changed their attitudes toward nuclear power after the accident in Fukushima? Energy Policy, 69, 356-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.02.026
Sims, R. E. H., Rogner, H., & Gregory, K. (2003). Carbon emission and mitigation cost comparisons between fossil fuel, nuclear and renewable energy resources for electricity generation. Energy Policy, 31(13), 1315-1326. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00192-1
Vaillancourt, K., Labriet, M., Loulou, R., & Waaub, J. P. (2008). The role of nuclear energy in long-term climate scenarios: An analysis with the world-times model. Energy Policy, 36(7), 2296-2307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.01.015
Verbruggen, A. (2008). Renewable and nuclear power: A common future? Energy Policy, 36(11), 4036-4047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.024
Visschers, V. H. M., & Siegrist, M. (2013). How a nuclear power plant accident influences acceptance of nuclear power: Results of a longitudinal study before and after the Fukushima disaster. Risk Analysis, 33(2), 333-347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01861.x
Wang, S., Wang, J., Lin, S., & Li, J. (2019). Public perceptions and acceptance of nuclear energy in China: The role of public knowledge, perceived benefit, perceived risk and public engagement. Energy Policy, 126, 352-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.040
WNA. (2020). World nuclear performance report 2020. World Nuclear Association. www.world-nuclear.org/getmedia/3418bf4a-5891-4ba1-b6c2-d83d8907264d/performance-report-2020-v1.pdf.aspx
Yeo, S., Cacciatore, M., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D., Runge, K., Su, L., Kim, J., Xenos, M., & Corley, E. (2014). Partisan amplification of risk: American perceptions of nuclear energy risk in the wake of the Fukushima Daiichi disaster. Energy Policy, 67, 727-736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.061
Yim, M., Vaganov, P. (2003). Effects of education on nuclear risk perception and attitude. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 42(2), 221-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-1970(03)80010-0

How to cite this article

APA

Vavoulioti, A. R., Stylos, G., & Kotsis, K. T. (2023). Acceptance of nuclear energy by pre-service teachers in Greece. Aquademia, 7(1), ep23004. https://doi.org/10.30935/aquademia/13205

Vancouver

Vavoulioti AR, Stylos G, Kotsis KT. Acceptance of nuclear energy by pre-service teachers in Greece. AQUADEMIA. 2023;7(1):ep23004. https://doi.org/10.30935/aquademia/13205

AMA

Vavoulioti AR, Stylos G, Kotsis KT. Acceptance of nuclear energy by pre-service teachers in Greece. AQUADEMIA. 2023;7(1), ep23004. https://doi.org/10.30935/aquademia/13205

Chicago

Vavoulioti, Antonia Rafailia, Georgios Stylos, and Konstantinos T. Kotsis. "Acceptance of nuclear energy by pre-service teachers in Greece". Aquademia 2023 7 no. 1 (2023): ep23004. https://doi.org/10.30935/aquademia/13205

Harvard

Vavoulioti, A. R., Stylos, G., and Kotsis, K. T. (2023). Acceptance of nuclear energy by pre-service teachers in Greece. Aquademia, 7(1), ep23004. https://doi.org/10.30935/aquademia/13205

MLA

Vavoulioti, Antonia Rafailia et al. "Acceptance of nuclear energy by pre-service teachers in Greece". Aquademia, vol. 7, no. 1, 2023, ep23004. https://doi.org/10.30935/aquademia/13205