Research Article

Assessment of Nigerian Biology Teachers’ Knowledge of Errors in Biological Drawing

Ganiyu Bello 1 *
More Detail
1 Department of Science Education, Faculty of Education, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, NIGERIA* Corresponding Author
Aquademia, 6(1), 2022, ep22004,
Published: 29 June 2022
OPEN ACCESS   346 Views   348 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)


In this survey research, biology teachers’ knowledge of errors in biological drawing was assessed with a focus on their qualifications and years of teaching experience. A total of 100 out of 235 biology teachers in public secondary schools in Kwara State Central Senatorial District, Nigeria took part in the study. The teachers were selected through stratified random sampling procedure. An assessment test titled “identification of errors in biological drawing test” (IEBDT) designed by the researcher was used to gather data in the study. The reliability coefficient of IEBDT was 0.83. Results of the study revealed that biology teachers had poor knowledge of errors in biological drawings and that a significant difference does not exist in their knowledge of errors in biological drawing based on their qualifications and years of teaching experience. It was recommended that biology teacher education programs should be re-jigged while biology teachers were admonished to regularly participate in teacher professional development programs. Further research studies to determine factors responsible for the teachers’ poor knowledge of errors in biological drawing and lack of significant difference in their knowledge based on qualifications and teaching experience in contrast to logical expectations was also, recommended in the study.


Bello, G. (2022). Assessment of Nigerian Biology Teachers’ Knowledge of Errors in Biological Drawing. Aquademia, 6(1), ep22004.


  1. Abe, T. O., & Owoeye, P. O. (2012). Teachers’ perception of difficult topics in biology curriculum in secondary schools in Ondo State. Journal of Research in Science Education, 1(1),116-127.
  2. Adegboye, M. C., Bello, G., & Abimbola, I. O. (2017). Conceptions of the nature of biology held by senior secondary school biology teachers in Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(3), 1-12.
  3. Bello, G., Aransiola, O. M., Aromire, F., & Alani, C. (2021). Analysis of diagram errors in selected Nigerian secondary school practical biology textbooks. Journal Bioedukatika [Journal Bioedukatika], 9(3).
  4. Burns, J. R. (2020). Semester-long instruction in drawing for biology change, study habits, motivation to draw, and approaches to problem-solving [Master’s thesis, College of William & Mary].
  5. Cromley, J. G., Perez, A. C., Fitzhugh, S., Tanaka, J., Newcombe, N., & Wills, T. W. (2015). Teaching effective use of diagrammatic reasoning in biology. Grantome.
  6. Dempsey, B. C., & Betz, B. J. (2001). Biological drawing: A scientific tool for learning. American Biology Teacher, 63(4), 271-279.
  7. Egun, K. N. (2016). Teacher qualification and students’ performance in biology: A study schools in Ethiope East Local Government Area of Delta State [Master’s thesis, University of Benin].
  8. Ihejiamaizu, C. C., Etop, E. E., & Obi, M. B. (2020). Effect of practical drawing as difficult concept and gender difference on students’ academic achievement in biology: Empirics of Calabar Education Zone, Cross River State, Nigeria. European Journal of Scientific Research, 158(2), 69-76.
  9. Liu, Y., Won, M., & Treagust, D. F. (2014). Secondary biology teachers’ use of different types of diagrams for different purposes. In B. Eilam, & J. Gilbert (Eds.), Science teachers’ use of visual representations. Springer, Cham.
  10. National Research Council. (2012). Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. National Academies Press.
  11. Nersessian, N. J. (1999). Model-based reasoning in conceptual change. In L. Magnani, N.J. Nersessian, & P. Thagard (Eds.), Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery. Springer.
  12. Oxford Cambridge and RSA. (2015). Teacher guide, A level biology A, biology B (Advancing biology: Biological drawing.
  13. Oyelekan, O. S., Igbokwe, E. F., & Olorundare, A. S. (2018). Science teachers’ utilisation of innovative strategies for teaching senior school science in Ilorin, Nigeria. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(2), 49-65.
  14. Patrick, P. G., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2014). Science teachers’ drawings of what is inside the human body. Journal of Biological Education, 44(2), 81-87.
  15. Petr, J., & Rokos, L. (2018). Initial skills in drawing of the pre-service biology teachers [Paper presention]. The 13th Conference of the European Science Education Research Association. Bologna, Italy.
  16. Quillin, K., & Thomas, S. (2015). Drawing-to-learn: A framework for using drawings to promote model-based reasoning in biology. CBE Life Sciences Education, 14(1), es2.
  17. Shin, S. J., Oliver, L., & John, M. (2018). Diagrams. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University.
  18. Soyibo, K. (1997). Pre-service teachers’ knowledge of biological labelling errors. Journal of Education and Development in Caribbean, 1(2), 152-162.
  19. Terry, Q. (2002). Introduction to visual modeling with rational rose 2002 and UML. Addison-Wesley.
  20. Topsakal, U. U., & Oversby, J. (2012). Turkish student teachers’ ideas about diagrams of a flower and a plant cell. Journal of Biological Education, 46(2), 81-92.
  21. Ukala, G. (2018). Utilization of innovative teaching strategies for biology teaching in senior secondary school. African Journal of Science Technology and Mathematics Education, 4(1), 30-37.
  22. Wekesa, E. T. (2013). An assessment of how students’ mastery of drawing skills in secondary schools affects performance in biology in Bungoma West District, Kenya. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 4(3).
  23. West African Examinations Council. (2021). WAEC-biology.