Research Article

Attitudes and Behaviors of University Students Towards Electromagnetic Radiation of Cell Phones and Wireless Networks

Leonidas Gavrilas 1 * , Konstantinos T. Kotsis 1, Marianna-Sotiria Papanikolaou 1
More Detail
1 Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, GREECE* Corresponding Author
Aquademia, 6(2), 2022, ep22009,
Published: 23 August 2022
OPEN ACCESS   694 Views   475 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)


The research into the electromagnetic radiation of mobile phones and wireless networks is relatively small, although they are some of the devices that people use daily. The study aimed to investigate the attitudes and behaviors of college students about electromagnetic radiation from mobile phones and wireless networks, as well as to examine the impact of the curricula of the university departments in which they study. The study involved 619 students from six different university departments. Data collection was performed using a closed-ended questionnaire. The general conclusion of the research was that students have incomplete knowledge about the electromagnetic radiation emitted by mobile phones and wireless networks, while at the same time they have a negative attitude and consider it dangerous to the health of living organisms. However, their behaviors regarding the protection of their health do not match with the attitudes they have formed, while in the majority they are significantly related to the university department in which they study.


Gavrilas, L., Kotsis, K. T., & Papanikolaou, M.-S. (2022). Attitudes and Behaviors of University Students Towards Electromagnetic Radiation of Cell Phones and Wireless Networks. Aquademia, 6(2), ep22009.


  1. Abrami, P. (2008). Instructional interventions affecting critical thinking skills and dispositions: A stage 1 meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 1102-1134.
  2. Abramson, M., Benke, G., Dimitiadis, C., Inyang, I., Sim, M., Wolfe, R., & Croft, R. (2009). Mobile telephone use is associated with changes in cognitive functions in young adolescents. Bioelectromagnetics, 30, 678-686.
  3. Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical data analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  4. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior. In D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (ISBN: 1138648256, pp. 173-221). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  5. Al Khelaiwi, T., & Meo, S. (2004). Association of mobile phone radiation with fatigue, headache, dizziness, tension and sleep disturbances in Saudi. Saudi Medical Journal, 25(6), 732-736.
  6. Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 471-499.
  7. Bagozzi, R. P. (1981). Attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A test of some key hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(4), 607-627.
  8. Baste, V., Riise, T., & Moen, B. (2008). Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields; male infertility and sex ratio of offspring. European Journal of Epidemiology, 23(5), 369-377.
  9. Behar-Horenstein, L., & Niu, L. (2011). Teaching critical thinking skills in higher education: A review of the literature. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 8(2), 25-42.
  10. Bernroider, E., Krumay, B., & Margiol, S. (2014). Not without my smartphone! Impacts of smartphone addiction on smartphone usage. In Proceedings of the 25th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1-10).
  11. Bhardwaj, M., & Ashok, S. J. (2015). Mobile phone addiction and loneliness among teenagers. The International Journal of Indian Psychology 2(3), 27-34.
  12. Bhattacherjee, A., & Sanford, C., (2006). When attitudes do not predict behavior: A study of attitude strength. In Proceedings of the 12th Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1071-1075).
  13. Blettner, M., Schlehofer, B., Brekenkamp, J., Kowall, B., Schmiedel, S., Reis, U., Potthoff, P., Schuz, J., & Berg-Beckhoff, G. (2009). Mobile phone base stations and adverse health effects: Phase 1: A population-based cross-sectional study in Germany. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 66(2), 118-123.
  14. Burcin, S., & Ince, E. (2010). Internet as a source of misconception: “Radiation and radioactivity”. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(4), 94-100.
  15. Capik, C., & Gozum, S. (2015). Psychometric features of an assessment instrument with likert and dichotomous response formats. Public Health Nursing, 32(1), 81-86.
  16. Carlberg, M., & Hardell, L. (2012). On the association between glioma, wireless phones, heredity and ionising radiation. Pathophysiology, 19, 243-252.
  17. Cousin, M.-E., & Siegrist, M. (2008). Laypeople’s health concerns and health beliefs in regard to risk perception of mobile communication. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 14(6), 1235-1249.
  18. Dixit, S., Shukla, H., Bhagwat, A., Bindal, A., Goyal, A., Zaidi, A., & Shrivastava, A. (2010). A study to evaluate mobile phone dependence among students of a medical college and associated hospital of central India. Indian Journal of Community Medicine: Official Publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine, 35(2), 339-341.
  19. Dodge, Y. (2008). The concise encyclopedia of statistics. Springer.
  20. Dresselhaus, A., & Shrode, F. (2012). Mobile technologies & academics: Do students use mobile technologies in their academic lives and are librarians ready to meet this challenge? Information Technology and Libraries, 31(2), 82-101.
  21. FCC. (2009). Specific absorption rate (SAR) for cellular telephones. Federal Communications Commission.
  22. Fowler, J., & Noyes, J. (2017). A study of the health implications of mobile phone use in 8-14s. DYNA, 84(200), 228-233.
  23. Gagan, S., & Rakesh, P. (2013). Use of Internet for research and educational activities by research scholars: A study of D.S.B. campus of Kumaun. University-Nainital. International Journal of Engineering and Management Sciences, 4(2), 193-199.
  24. Gautam S., & Shakya, J. (2016). Knowledge regarding harmful effects on cell phone use among higher secondary school students Bharatpur Chitwan Nepal. Journal of Chitwan Medical, 6(18), 47-53.
  25. Gavrilas, L. (2017). Perceptions of University students on electromagnetic pollution of information and communications technology equipment [Postgraduate dissertation, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece].
  26. Glasman, L. R., & Albarracín, D. (2006). Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: A meta-analysis of the attitude-behavior relation. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 778-822.
  27. Glen, S. (2016). “Kuder-Richardson 20 (KR-20) & 21 (KR-21)”. Elementary statistics for the rest of us.
  28. Government Advice. (2022). Wired child, protecting our children from wireless technology.
  29. Gullone, E., & Moore, S. (2000). Adolescent risk-taking and the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Adolescence, 23, 393-407.
  30. Gustaffson, E., Johnson, P., Lindegard, A., & Hagberg, M. (2011). Technique, muscle activity, kinematic differences in young adults texting on mobile phones. Ergonomics, 54, 477-487.
  31. Han, S., & Yi, Y. (2018). How does the smartphone usage of college students affect academic performance? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(1), 3-22.
  32. Hassoy, H., Durusoy, R., & Karababa, A. (2013). Adolescents’ risk perceptions on mobile phones and their base stations, their trust to authorities and incivility in using mobile phones: A cross-sectional survey on 2240 high school students in Izmir, Turkey. Environmental Health, 12(10), 1-10.
  33. Hepworth, S., Schoemaker, M., Muir, K., Swerdlow, A., Tongeren, M., & McKinney, P. (2006). Mobile phone use and risk of glioma in adults: Case control study. British Medical Journal, 332, 883-887.
  34. Howe, L. C., & Krosnick, J. A. (2017). Attitude strength. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 327-351.
  35. IARC. (2011). IARC classifies radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans. World Health Organisation.
  36. ICNIRP. (2009). Exposure to high frequency electromagnetic fields, biological effects and health consequences (100 kHz-300 GHz). International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection.
  37. Jun, S. (2016). The reciprocal longitudinal relationships between mobile phone addiction and depressive symptoms among Korean adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 179-186.
  38. Kamibeppu, K., & Sugiura, H. (2005). Impact of the mobile phone on junior high-school students’ friendships in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 8(2), 121-130.
  39. Kang, S., & Jung, J. (2014). Mobile communication for human needs: A comparison of smartphone use between the US and Korea. Computers in Human Behavior, 35(1), 76-387.
  40. Kasesniemi, E., & Rautiainen, P. (2002). Mobile culture of children and teenagers in Finland. In J. Katz, & M. Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 170-192). Cambridge University Press.
  41. Klaeboe, L., Blaasaas, K., & Tynes, T. (2007). Use of mobile phones in Norway and risk of intracranial tumours. European Journal of Cancer Prevention, 16, 158-164.
  42. Klein, G., & Dabney, A. (2013). The cartoon introduction to statistics. Hill & Wamg.
  43. Kraus, S. J. (1995). Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(1), 58-75.
  44. Kristiansen, I. S., Elstein, A. S., Gyrd-Hansen, D., Kildemoes, H. W., & Nielsen, J. B. (2009). Radiation from mobile phone systems: Is it perceived as a threat to people’s health? Bioelectromagnetics, 30(5), 393-401.
  45. Krithika, M., & Vasantha, S. (2013). The mobile phone usage among teens and young adults impact of invading technology. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 2(12), 7259-7265.
  46. Kumar, D., & Sriram, A. (2018). The attitude towards smartphones and its influence on process, social and compulsive usage. Athens Journal of Mass Media and Communications, 4(4), 301-318.
  47. Kumar, L., Chii, K., Way, L., Jetly, Y., & Rajendaran, V. (2011). Awareness of mobile phone hazards among university students in a Malaysian medical school. Health 3(7), 406-415.
  48. Kuss, D., Harkin, L., Kanjo, E., & Billieux, J. (2018). Problematic smartphone use: Investigating contemporary experiences using a convergent design. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(1), 1-16.
  49. Lee, H. S., Addicott, M., Martin, L. E., Harris, K. J., Goggin, K., Richter, K. P., Patten, C. A., McClernon, F. J., Fleming, K., & Catley, D. (2017). Implicit attitudes and smoking behavior in a smoking cessation induction trial. Nicotine & Tobacco Research: Official Journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 20(1), 58-66.
  50. Levitt, B., & Lai, H. (2010). Biological effects from exposure to electromagnetic radiation emitted by cell tower base stations and other antenna arrays. Environment, 18, 369-395.
  51. Lonn, S., Ahlbom, A., Hall, P., & Feychting, M. (2005). Long-term mobile phone use and brain tumor risk. American Journal of Epidemiology, 161, 526-535.
  52. Mantel, N. (1963). Chi-square tests with one degree of freedom; extensions of the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(303), 690-700.
  53. Marin, L., & Halpern, D. (2011). Pedagogy for developing critical thinking in adolescents: Explicit instruction produces greatest gains. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6(1), 1-13.
  54. Martha, C., & Griffet, J. (2007). Brief report: How do adolescents perceive the risks related to cell-phone use? Journal of Adolescence, 30, 513-521.
  55. McEvov, S., Stevenson, M., Mccertt, A., Woodward, M., & Haworth, C. (2005). Role of mobile phone in motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance in Sydney. British Medical Journal, 20(4), 331-428.
  56. Meena, J. K., Verma, A., Kohli, C., & Ingle, G. K. (2016). Mobile phone use and possible cancer risk: Current perspectives in India. Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 20(1), 5-9.
  57. Muhanna, W., & Abu AlShar, A. (2009). University students attitudes towards cell phone learning environment. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 3(4), 35-40.
  58. Nasser, S., Amer, N., Ghobashi, M., Morcos, G., Hafez, S., Shaheen, W., & Helmy, M. (2018). Knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) study and antioxidant status among mobile phone users. Bioscience Research, 15(4), 3658-3664.
  59. Neumann, S. (2014). Three misconceptions about radiation, and what we teachers can do to confront them. American Association of Physics Teachers, 52(6), 357-359.
  60. Neumann, S., & Hopf, M. (2012). Students’ conceptions about ‘radiation’: Results from an explorative interview study of 9th grade students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21, 826-834.
  61. Omar, M., Ahmad, M., Yasin, A., Ibrahim, H., Ghazali, O., & Khamis, S. (2018). The impact of Wi-Fi usage on students’ academic performance. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(4), 240-244.
  62. Oulasvirta, A., Rattenbury, T., Ma, L., & Raita, E. (2012). Habits make smartphone use more pervasive. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 16(1), 105-114.
  63. Pearson, J. C., Carmon, A., Tobola, C., & Fowler, M. (2010). Motives for communication: Why the millennial generation uses electronic devices. Journal of the Communication. Speech & Theatre Association of North Dakota, 22, 45-56.
  64. Pendse, N., & Zagade, T. (2014). Knowledge and attitude regarding health hazards of mobile phone users among the junior college students. International Journal of Science and Research, 3(5), 554-561.
  65. Piper, B., Daily, S., Martin, S., & Martin, M. (2019). Evaluation of a brief intervention to reduce cell phone use in college students. medRxiv, 1-30.
  66. Quaigrain, K., & Arhin, K. (2017). Using reliability and item analysis to evaluate a teacher developed test in educational measurement and evaluation. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1-11.
  67. Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (ISBN: ISBN-0-02-897194-9, pp. 102-119). Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
  68. Sahin, Y., Balta, S., & Ercan, T. (2010). The use of Internet resources by university students during their course projects elicitation: A Case Study. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(2), 234-244.
  69. Salehan, M., & Negahban, A. (2013). Social networking on smartphones: When mobile phones become addictive. Computers in Human Behavior 29(6), 2632-2639.
  70. Shinde, M., & Patel, S. (2014). Corelation between problematic internet use and mental health in professional education students. International Journal of Science and Research, 3(2), 194-202.
  71. Siegrist, M., Earle, T., Gutsche, H., & Keller, C. (2005). Perception of mobile phone and base station risks. Risk Anal, 25, 1253-1264.
  72. Singla, A., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (2019). Mobile phone use and possible cancer risk: A review. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, 10(11), 1514-1518.
  73. Subha, M. (2017). A survey on importance and challenges of radio waves in wireless communications. IOSR Journal of Computer Engineering, 5(7), 34-38.
  74. Trochim, W. M. (2005). The research methods knowledge base.
  75. van Deursen, A., Bolle, C., Hegner, S., & Kommers, P. (2015). The role of smartphone usage types, emotional intelligence, social stress, self-regulation, age and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 411-420.
  76. Varshney, S., Malhotra, M., Sharma, S., & Aggarwal, P. (2018). Specific absorption rate (SAR) value of mobile phones: An awareness study among mobile users. Indian Journal of Community Health, 30(2), 156-162.
  77. Walsh, S., White, K., & Young, R. (2008). Over-connected? A qualitative exploration of the relationship between Australian youth and their mobile phones. Journal of Adolescent Health, 31(1), 77-92.
  78. World Energy Council. (2016). World energy resources. World Energy Council.
  79. World Health Organization. (1998). Electromagnetic fields and public health public perception of EMF risks. World Health Organization.
  80. Yan, J., Agresti, M., Zhang, L., Yan, Y., & Matloub, H. (2009). Up regulation of specific mRNA levels in rat brain after cell phone exposure. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 27(2), 147-154.
  81. Zickuhrs, K. (2011). Generations and their gadgets. Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project.